Legal Opinion

Martindale v. De Kay

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 21, 1917, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, a jury having been waived.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 21, 1917, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, a jury having been waived. The complaint alleged that on December 21, 1911, one William T. Evans, being then the president and treasurer of Mills & Gibb, signed and delivered to the defendant a check óf Mills & Gibb, drawn on the Chemical National Bank, for $1,000, payable to the order of the defendant; that defendant received said check in…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and McLaughlin, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearl-Wick Corp. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance (In Re Pearl-Wick Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Gaylord v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pink v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Martindale v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API