Gustafson v. V. C. Taylor & Son, Inc.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WALTHER, J.
The plaintiffs are lawyers duly admitted to practice law in the state of Ohio, and the defendant is a corporation engaged in the real estate business. The plaintiffs in their petition for injunction claim that the defendant is practicing law and that such practice of law by the defendant is an unauthorized practice of law. The defendant denies the claims of the plaintiff with respect to its practicing law, and the court is therefore called upon to determine whether the acts of the defendant constitute the practice of law by it.
The following observations are made with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frahm v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Unauthorized Practice in Franklin CoOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Gustafson v. JestrabCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1940
- Mintz v. Hritz-Miskolczy, Inc.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martineau v. GresserClinton County Court of Common Pleas · 1962