Legal Opinion
In re Unauthorized Practice in Franklin Co
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By KING, J.
The action herein was brought by the committee, heretofore appointed by the court in the matter of the unauthorized practice of law. The committee seeks to enjoin Ivan H. Gore from engaging in the practice of law.
The complaint lodged by the committee in substance alleges that Ivan H. Gore is not an attorney at law and has not been admitted to the practice of the law in the state of Ohio, and does not have the necessary qualifications to practice under the laws of Ohio and the regulations of the Supreme Court of Ohio. That notwithstanding this fact the said Ivan Gore has for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Boykin v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Paul v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- BergeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martineau v. GresserClinton County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
- Gustafson v. V. C. Taylor & Son, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1940
- Ralph R. Greek & Co. v. McGinnisCity of Columbus Municipal Court · 1965