Legal Opinion

Marubeni America Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 14, 1993No. Court 90-04-00210PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This matter is before the court for decision following a trial de novo. The issue before the court is whether Model Year 1989 and 1990 two-wheel and four-wheel drive Nissan Pathfinders are properly classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTS”), heading 8704, “Motor vehicles for the transport of goods,” or under heading 8703, “Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons (other than those of heading 8702 [public transport passenger vehicles]), including station wagons and racing cars.” There is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. International Spring Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  3. Inner Secrets/Secretly Yours, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. THK America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API