Legal Opinion
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Ethyl Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 23, 1984No. 413, 414, Dockets 83-4102, 83-4106PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company (“Du Pont”) and Ethyl Corporation (“Ethyl”), the nation’s two largest manufacturers of lead antiknock gasoline additives, petition this court pursuant to § 5(c) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(c), to review and set aside a final order of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) entered with an accompanying opinion on April 1, 1983. The FTC held that Du Pont, Ethyl and two other antiknock compound manufacturers, PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”) and Nalco Chemical Company (“Nalco”), had engaged in unfair methods of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Reserve Supply Corporation v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and Certainteed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ciardi v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Paddock Publications, Inc., Doing Business as the Daily Herald v. Chicago Tribune CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.