Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Preisigke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order denying its motion to stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim of Kurt Preisigke.
The facts may be briefly stated. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. insured a vehicle driven by Preisigke. The policy included an uninsured motorist endorsement. On October 27, 1983, Preisigke was injured when the car he was driving collided with a car owned by Karen Zakrzewski. The Zakrzewski vehicle had been insured by respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. under the New York Assigned Risk Plan and the policy was financed by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ward v. GreshamNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Roth v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Allstate Insurance v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- AIU Insurance v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Fritzen v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Government Employees Insurance v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. RolloNew York Supreme Court · 1997