Legal Opinion

Fritzen v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Defendant failed to show, by proof of an office practice or procedure followed in the regular course of business, that the policy of insurance issued to plaintiff was duly addressed and mailed (see, Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray, 46 NY2d 828). The mere assertion by one of defendant’s agents that the policy "was sent”, supported by the agent’s reference to an ambiguous notation on a microfiche record purporting to document the mailing,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Friedman v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PreisigkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API