Legal Opinion

Schecter v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1919No. 9290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Conejos County Court, Hon. Jose A. Garcia, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen.

This is an action for damages. The plaintiff was the owner of a field of peas which adjoined a like field in possession of the defendant. The defendant pastured a certain number of cattle upon his own field. The animals strayed and trespassed a few times upon the plaintiff’s land, and it is to recover for the injury caused thereby that this, action was brought. The plaintiff obtained a judgment, and the defendant brings error.

A line fence separated plaintiff’s field from that of the defendant. It is conceded that this fence was not a legal and sufficient fence,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richards v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Bell v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolten v. GatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  2. Bullerdick v. PritchardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API