Legal Opinion

Bullerdick v. Pritchard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1932No. 12,977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties are hereinafter referred to by name. Pritchard sued Bullerdick for $1,160 actual damages caused by trespass of sheep. This he alleged was accompanied by malice and reckless disregard of his rights, wherefore he demanded $1,000 additional as “smart money.” The jury returned a verdict for $600 actual, and $700 exemplary damages. To review a judgment entered accordingly Bullerdick prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas. Both request final judgment on this application. A portion of Pritchard’s claim was held by assignment, but since no question here raised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Richards v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Page v. YoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  4. Richner v. Plateau Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Williamson v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Preston v. DupontSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Seaward Const. Co., Inc. v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Cope v. Vermeer Sales & Service of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Wegner v. Rodeo Cowboys AssociationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API