Legal Opinion

Moeller v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 28, 2011No. 09-5670PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, C.J., joined by Guy, J.,

GUY, J. (pp. 956-58), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MOORE, J. (pp. 958-59), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, (“Garlock”), a manufacturer of industrial sealing products, appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict against it. Because we conclude that the evidence is *952not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we REVERSE.

I

Robert Moeller (“Robert”), a pipefitter, worked with asbestos-containing gaskets made by Garlock…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Lindstrom v. A-C Product Liability TrustCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Spivey Ex Rel. Spivey v. SheelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Honeywell International Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Krik v. Crane Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
  4. Darrell Connor v. Covil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. Waite v. AII Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API