Moeller v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, C.J., joined by Guy, J.,
GUY, J. (pp. 956-58), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MOORE, J. (pp. 958-59), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, (“Garlock”), a manufacturer of industrial sealing products, appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict against it. Because we conclude that the evidence is *952not sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we REVERSE.
I
Robert Moeller (“Robert”), a pipefitter, worked with asbestos-containing gaskets made by Garlock…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Lindstrom v. A-C Product Liability TrustCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Spivey Ex Rel. Spivey v. SheelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davis v. Honeywell International Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Krik v. Crane Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Darrell Connor v. Covil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Waite v. AII Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.