Legal Opinion

Danciger v. Wells

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided July 5, 1907No. Nos. 3,222, 3,223PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On Application for Temporary Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

By the bills of complaint presented in the above-entitled suits there is involved the rights of complainants, wholesale liquor dealers, citizens of the city of Kansas City and state of Missouri, to a mandatory order of injunction commanding defendants, common carriers doing a general express business, and citizens of states other than Missouri, on payment or tender of the usual amount charged for such service by defendants, to receive and carry, liquors sold by complainants in the state of Missouri to many persons throughout the country, on written orders received, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Tilley v. County of CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  2. Barnhart v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Midland Valley Railroad v. Hoffman Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Anthony v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Lawton Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API