Legal Opinion

Goldblatt v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1934No. 13,033PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

We will refer to the parties on this review as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff, as the executor of the estate of George McCarroll, deceased, brought this action against Simon Spiegleman, M. H. Spiegleman and Moses L. Goldblatt to recover judgment on two due and unpaid promissory notes. His complaint, in two causes of action, alleges that he was the lawful holder and| owner of the notes; that they, together with interest coupons, were executed by defendants June 8, 1927, payable to the order of one Haines and in the amounts of $12,500 and $2,500…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sigel-Campion Live Stock Commission Co. v. ArdohainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salazar v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. United States v. State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Centennial Square, Ltd. v. Resolution Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Colorado National Bank-Exchange v. HammarColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API