Legal Opinion
Alpenhof, LLC v. City of Ouray
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 2013No. 12CA0500PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge WEBB.
T1 Plaintiff, Alpenhof, LLC, raises an unresolved question in Colorado: whether flooding risk from a diverted natural waterway channel involves either a "geologic condition" or a "natural hazard" within the meaning of a zoning code. Defendant, City of Ouray, denied Alpenhof's subdivision application, finding that flooding risk from a diverted creek required mitigation, for which the application did not provide. The district court rejected Alpenhof's C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) *1054challenge to this denial. Alpenhof now appeals.
12 We conclude that the city properly denied Alpenhof's…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Ross v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- General Insurance Co. of America v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wisdom Works Counseling Services, P.C. v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Hotsenpiller v. MorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Whitelaw, III v. Denver City CouncilColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- v. TunColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Big Sur Waterbeds v. City of LakewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.