Legal Opinion

Hanauer Ex Rel. Wogahn v. Siegel

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 25, 1939No. 47325PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLY, District Judge.

Plaintiff has propounded certain interrogatories which defendant has failed to answer averring that it is not informed and therefore cannot answer the questions. Plaintiff because of failure of defendant to answer is asking for a summary judgment. I am of the opinion that where the plaintiff makes a request for admissions under Rule 36, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the defendant must answer even though he has no personal knowledge if the means of information are within his power. It is not sufficient that he does not…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smyth v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Masten v. MastenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  4. Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  5. Driver v. Gindy Manufacturing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API