Legal Opinion
Village of Maineville, Ohio v. Hamilton Township Board of Trustees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2013No. 12-4379PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Hamilton Township passed a resolution imposing fees on developers of residential property in the area. As a covered developer, Salt Run sought to avoid the fees by convincing the Village of Maineville to annex the land the company owned. Hamilton Township countered this maneuver by placing a lien on the property anyway. Salt Run responded by suing the Township, raising a host of federal and state law claims, including a takings claim under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Meanwhile, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Hamilton Township had no right to impose the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eileen Cowell v. Palmer TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Muscarello v. Ogle County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Northwest Ohio Properties, Ltd. v. Lucas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Howard v. Preble County SheriffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015