Eisenring v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to restrain the enforcement of an order for payment of alimony pendente Ute. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Prohibition. In an action for divorce brought by Charles Eisenring against his wife, petitioner herein, the court, upon application therefor by the husband, made an order requiring the wife, at a time specified therein, to pay the husband suit money and alimony pendente Ute. She refused to comply with the order; whereupon she was cited to appear and show cause why she should not be adjudged guilty of contempt.
The contention of petitioner is that this order is void, and hence the court had no jurisdiction to proceed against her as for contempt for failure to comply therewith. We are in full…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Livingston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Brenger v. BrengerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Glynn v. GlynnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Greene v. GreeneNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Hagert v. TempletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hopkins v. DetrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Kruly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- California Filter Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- State ex rel. Jacobson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Norman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925