Legal Opinion

Schierman v. Beckett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9776PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court. .

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

— The appellee Beckett sued his co-appellee, Elizabeth Schierman, and the appellants upon a promissory note executed by the defendants to the plaintiff February 16th, 1881, payable one day after date.

The appellee Elizabeth answered, alleging that the only consideration for the note sued on was that it was given as a part payment upon a pretended contract for the sale of land by the plaintiff to her .co-defendant Martin Schierman; that it had no relation to, or connection with, any other transaction or any contract or business to which she was a party; and that at the time of signing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. DonathonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. McGowen v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  3. Humphrey v. FairIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Rhodes' Administrators v. StorrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ames v. AmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Cochran v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Doney v. LaughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Lowman v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McCoy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API