Legal Opinion
Orange v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 6, 2005No. 3D05-335PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
898 So.2d 1185 (2005)
Rudolph V. ORANGE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 6, 2005.
Rudolph V. Orange, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Valentina M. Tejera, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
CORTIÑAS, J.
Rudolph V. Orange appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. Defendant-appellant was sentenced to thirty years in state prison, with a fifteen year minimum mandatory sentence, for drug trafficking.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Burgal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Modest v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cortes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006