Legal Opinion

Cortes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 18, 2006No. 3D05-1470Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

David Andrew Cortes appeals from an order denying his second motion to correct illegal sentence claiming that his upward departure sentence violated the principles enunciated in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. *681296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We affirm because these decisions do not apply to Cortes’ sentence.

In Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837, 839 (Fla.2005), the Florida Supreme Court confirmed that these…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API