Legal Opinion
Escano v. Concord Auto Protect, Inc.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided August 19, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00223Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO RUBEN ESCANO, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 2:21-223 MV/GJF CONCORD AUTO PROTECT, INC., FOREVERCAR, LLC, LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL AUTO AND HOME SERVICES, LLC, ALON SALMAN, and DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE AND ALL OF THEM, Defendants. PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION1 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case and for Relief from Judgment (“the Motion”), which is fully briefed. ECFs 121, 123–24. Having thoroughly considered the Motion, briefing, and applicable law, the Court RECOMMENDS that the Motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kemp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Burton v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- L. C. Collins and Lucille Collins, His Wife Earl Schneider and Mildred Schneider, His Wife v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.