Legal Opinion

LEVINE

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1969No. 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1968 MATTER OF LEVINE In Visa Petition Proceedings A-18485936 Decided by Board April 11, 1969 Since beneficiary's divorce obtained in Mexico at a timo when both parties thereto were permanent residents of, and domiciled in, Mexico, even though the parties to the divorce were not actually present in court but were represented by counsel, is recognized as valid under California law for the purpose of her subsequent marriage to the 'U.S. eitizen petitioner in that State, the marriage is recognized as valid for the purpose of con- ferring immediate relative status on beneficiary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Watson v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Scott v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. FREEMANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  5. KURTINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. HowertonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980
  2. LUNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  3. MABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  4. GAMEROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  5. MONCAYOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API