Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Luban v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, J. —

The writ of error brings for review judgment in habeas corpus proceedings remanding petitioner to the custody of the respondent who held the petitioner under a judgment of contempt.

The judgment of contempt is as follows:

“The Court: It is very patent to this court that you were deliberately lying in this case, trying to protect somebody.' So long as a man tries to tell the truth I am with him, but 1 have the utmost contempt for a liar. You are evidently trying to protect somebody. I am going to give you thirty days in jail for contempt of court.
“Witness Lubin : May 1 say something…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Ex parte SeniorSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Riley v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. People v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Emanuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. M.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Mitchell v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. State ex rel. Laramie v. BoggsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API