Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1991No. 90-1599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAWTHON, Senior Judge.

The City of Miami has appealed a workers’ compensation order awarding claimant, Charles Smith, pension offset benefits. On appeal, appellant contends: (1) the Judge of Compensation Claims did not have jurisdiction to award pension offset benefits; (2) competent substantial evidence does not support an award of pension offset benefits for the years 1975 and 1976; and (3) the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in finding that “should total benefits from the claimant’s workmens’ (sic) compensation entitlement and pension award exceed his average monthly wage, that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Brown v. SS Kresge Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. City of Pensacola v. WinchesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. City of Miami v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grice v. Escambia County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. City of Miami v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API