Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1992No. 91-527Published

1Per curiam

In this worker’s compensation case, appellant City of Miami appeals the order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) finding, pursuant to Florida Workers’ Compensation Rule of Procedure 4.161(c), that the City abandoned any challenge to compensation benefits from January 1, 1977 through July 31, 1989. We reverse.

Rule 4.161(c) states:

Abandonment. Any challenge to benefits certified as affected by appeal under Rule 4.160(a) of these rules, but not raised, argued or encompassed in appellant’s (or cross-appellant’s) initial brief, shall be deemed abandoned by the appellant (or cross-appellant).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Miami v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API