Pschesang v. Village of Terrace Park
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
The issue presented is whether appellant’s use of the property constitutes a nonconforming use. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that appellant’s use was illegal under the zoning ordinance in existence when he purchased the property and began using it as a dentist’s office and consequently, it did not constitute a nonconforming use when he subsequently applied for a building permit.
In discussing a nonconforming use, this court has stated that there is a “* * * right to continue the use of one’s property in a lawful business and in a manner which does not constitute a nuisance and…
2Cited by21 opinions
- City of Dublin v. FinkesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Bingham v. Wilmington Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Petti v. City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.