Legal Opinion

Pschesang v. Village of Terrace Park

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1983No. 82-870PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The issue presented is whether appellant’s use of the property constitutes a nonconforming use. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that appellant’s use was illegal under the zoning ordinance in existence when he purchased the property and began using it as a dentist’s office and consequently, it did not constitute a nonconforming use when he subsequently applied for a building permit.

In discussing a nonconforming use, this court has stated that there is a “* * * right to continue the use of one’s property in a lawful business and in a manner which does not constitute a nuisance and…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Dublin v. FinkesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Bingham v. Wilmington Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Petti v. City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API