Legal Opinion

Cage Realty, Inc. v. Hanna

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1994No. WD 49088Published

1Per curiam

Cage Realty, Inc. (“Cage”) appeals from a summary judgment in a suit to recover a brokerage commission. Cage contends that its written listing agreement with Hugh A. Hanna and Marguerite J. Hanna (“the Han-nas”) did not violate the Statute of Frauds.

Reversed and remanded.

On September 29, 1989, the parties signed a listing agreement which appointed Cage as the sole and exclusive agent to sell, on behalf of the Hannas, real estate consisting of 399 residential lots and adjoining commercial property. The listing agreement did not mention the purchase price of the property, but did state that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Seabaugh v. SailerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Badger v. FinlaysonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Roth v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Bollero v. WintermuteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API