Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2013No. 2012-2161PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying relief to appellant, Jeffrey Hopson, on his complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or procedendo. Hopson seeks to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to issue a sentencing opinion in his criminal case that complies with R.C. 2929.03(F). That statute requires a court or a panel of three judges to state “in a separate opinion” certain findings when imposing a sentence of life imprisonment in a capital case. The Eighth District, on motion for summary judgment by appellee, denied relief because Hopson’s complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Fontanella v. KontosOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Howard v. DoneghyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Boccuzzi v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Norris v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Sevilla v. CocroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. McDougald v. Kuhn (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Lemaster v. Meigs Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Norris v. Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API