Legal Opinion

Bartly v. Fraine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 16, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

CASE 15 — MOTION APPEAL PROM MONROE COUNTY COURT. CITED— 3 Met., 237; Lowe vs. Commonwealth. CITED— Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, chap. 97, 2 Stanton, 396. 13 B. Mon., 393 ; Lemmon vs. Peck.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion or the court:

On sufficient notice the appellees, as sureties in his official bond as sheriff of Monroe county, moved the county court of that county for additional security, “in consequence of official default.” After hearing the parties, the .court required additional security in a prescribed time, and the appellant failing to give it, was, by order of court, removed from office, and a successor was appointed and qualified for the unexpired term.

As the record exhibís none of the evidence heard on the trial, we must presume that it authorized the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lowe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Barnett v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Cornett v. Duff, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Field v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API