Legal Opinion

Knapp Ex Rel. Thayer v. Stone

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 4, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

In answer to what was considered to be an insinuation by counsel for the defendant that plaintiff’s counsel had suggested the testimony given by the plaintiff, his counsel said in the course of his argument: “I am the only counsel in this case, and I can say co you, gentlemen, in answer to my brother’s argument that I have not . . . told young Richard Knapp how to make up his story, or how to swear to it.” To this statement the defendant excepted. If there was evidence from which the inference could be drawn that plaintiff’s testimony was suggested by counsel it could not properly be answered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  2. Kambour v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  3. Walker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  4. Baldwin v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  5. Lee v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. State v. SantelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Kerzty v. WardymkaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API