Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 17, 2001No. Civ. 00-389 DSD/JGLPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of their claim for invasion of privacy — intrusion upon seclusion. Based upon a review of the file, record and proceedings, the court grants plaintiffs’ motion.

BACKGROUND

The factual background of this case has previously been set forth in this court’s orders on defendants’ motion to dismiss and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In short, beginning in March of 1998, plaintiffs Tony and Ann Bauer began receiving letters and phone calls from defendant Ford Motor Credit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Montgomery Ward v. LarragoiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Remsburg v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  3. Mallak v. Aitkin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  4. Bass v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. Kampschroer v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API