Legal Opinion

State v. Alix

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 12, 1972No. 975-Ex. &cPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, C. J.

This is a complaint and warrant charging that the defendant, Roger J. Alix, “* * * [d]id operate or was in direct charge of a hoisting crane of five (5) or more horsepower without obtaining a license to do so as provided in chapter 28-26 of the General Laws, in violation of section 28-26-5 of the General Laws.” The defendant’s plea in abatement was heard and denied on October 7, 1969, and after a trial without the intervention of a jury, the court found the defendant guilty. From that judgment of guilty the defendant has prosecuted a bill of exceptions to this court.

At trial it was not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Mitchell v. DixonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. PoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortner v. CousarColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Visage Express, Inc. v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. State v. PiscopioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API