Hidden Grove, LLC v. Brauns
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONERY, Judge.
|,The Plaintiff/Defendant in Reconvention/Appellee, Hidden Grove, LLC, moves to dismiss .the appeal- by the Defendants/Plaintiffs in Reconvention/ Appellants, Richard and Leslie Brauns. F.or the reasons assigned below, we deny-the motion to dismiss.
The instant litigation arises out of the purchase of lots in the Hidden Grove Subdivision. The Braunses purchased Lot 14 of this' subdivision from a third party-unrelated to this litigation. They purchased Lot 15 from Hidden Grove. In association with the purchase of Lot 15, the Braunses were also given a right of first refusal for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Root Glass Co. v. GaglianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Carter v. RheaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bordelon v. DauzatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hidden Grove, LLC v. BraunsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hidden Grove, LLC v. BraunsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017