Legal Opinion

Piscottano v. Murphy

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 14, 2004No. 3:04CV682 (MRK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

KRAVITZ, District Judge.

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1988 by five corrections officers employed by the State of Connecticut’s Department of Correction (“DOC”) who claim that the defendants — the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner and three Wardens of DOC — disciplined them in violation of their constitutional rights under the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment for associating with a motorcycle group known as the Outlaws Motorcycle Club (“Outlaws”). The present proceedings arise from the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction [doc. #…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piscottano v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Piscottano v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. Doninger Ex Rel. Doninger v. NiehoffDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API