Legal Opinion
Piscottano v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 21, 2007No. Docket 05-3716-cvPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Gary Piscottano, Mark J. Vin-cenzo, Walter C. Scappini II, and James Kight, who are current or former employees of the Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC” or the “Department”), appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Mark R. Kravitz, Judge, dismissing their claims that the defendant DOC officials violated, inter alia, their First Amendment and due process rights to freedom of expressive association and freedom of intimate association by disciplining them on account of their membership in, and their…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Raymond Smith v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Ross v. LichtenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Russell v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Mercer v. Dora B. Schriro, Comm'r of the Dep't of Emergency Servs. & Pub. Prot., the Conn. State Police Union, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.