Legal Opinion

No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports

Decided February 7, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOCO purported to adopt a constitutional reapportionment of all net proceeds of the state's lottery in order to dedicate those proceeds to the state's wildlife, park, river, trail and open space heritage as well as the repayment of certain preexisting financial obligations of the state. Article XXVII, § 3(1) adopts a definition of net proceeds for every state supervised lottery game operated under the authority of article XVIII, § 2, of the Colorado Constitution. All such net proceeds are "set aside, allocated, allotted, and continuously appropriated" for the preservation, protection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yenter v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Cooper Motors, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Colorado Common Cause v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Question Submitted by the United States Court of Claims v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Manly v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API