Legal Opinion

Question Submitted by the United States Court of Claims v. United States

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 13, 1978No. 27714PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

Upon rehearing, this is our response to a question certified to us by The United States Court of Claims in its case No. 105-75 pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1. The question so certified is:

*541“Under Colorado law, does the owner of a decreed water right to divert and use water from a natural stream have a right to receive water of such quality and condition, including the silt content thereof, as has historically been received under that right?” (emphasis added)

In the light of the emphasized portion of the question and the posture in which we perceive the question was certified to us, our answer to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  2. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Middelkamp v. Bessemer Irrigating Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Schodde v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. City of Colorado Springs v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Carrara Place, Ltd. v. Arapahoe County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Empire Lodge Homeowners' Ass'n v. MoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. BerglandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. Millenson v. Department of HighwaysColorado Court of Appeals · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API