Legal Opinion

Ben-Burk, Inc. v. Bernstein & Kursman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The complaint in this action sought the recovery of a balance due for liquors sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The assignments of error are addressed to the sustaining of a demurrer to the third defense to the complaint, to the finding, to the conclusions of the trial court and the overruling of the defendant’s claims of law.

The plaintiff was a Massachusetts corporation and in its dealings with the defendant was engaged in interstate commerce. The defendant was a Connecticut corporation located in Bridgeport licensed by the United States and the state of Connecticut to conduct a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sagal v. FylarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Vaszauskas v. VaszauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Tator v. ValdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Kane v. New Idea Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. National Surety Co. v. NazzaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connecticut Importing Co. v. JanowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API