Legal Opinion · Dissent
Nored v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 14, 1994No. 05-93-00208-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1DissentChapman, Justice
Because I would hold that the police had no authority to make a warrantless (1) entry, (2) search of the fenced area around appellant’s apartment, and (3) arrest, I respectfully dissent.
APPELLANT’S CONTENTION
In his first point of error, appellant contends that the fruits of the search must be suppressed because the police failed to obtain a search or arrest warrant before entering the fenced area. The majority does not interpret appellant’s first point of error as contending that the checking of the serial number on the bicycle is a search. Nored v. State, No. 05-93-00208-CR, 875 S.W.2d 392,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.