Price v. Denison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Jackson county to recover $1,000 ‘for'malicious prosecution. The case was tried before Lorin Cray, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $250. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for malicious prosecution, in which plaintiff had a verdict, ;and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.
It appears from the record that this was the second trial of the action, the verdict rendered on the first trial having been set aside and a new trial granted. At the opening of the former trial, counsel for defendant moved the court that plaintiff be required to elect whether "he would proceed with the case as an action for malicious prosecution .or for false imprisonment. Counsel for plaintiff, who commenced the action and conducted that trial, elected to proceed as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. . HowNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Eickhoff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Werner v. FliesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Glenn v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Cox v. LauritsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Allen v. Osco Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Eastman v. Leiser Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Gutterson v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.