Legal Opinion

Dyess v. Everett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1956No. 40225Published

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

E. H. Everett, Trustee in Bankruptcy, brought this suit against Mrs. Sue Hammond Dyess to cancel, as a fraudulent conveyance, a quitclaim deed dated October 3, 1951, executed to her by her husband, W. S. Dyess, insofar as it affected the right of the complainant to collect an indebtedness owing to A. J. Hill. Herbert C. Stillions, Jr. was made a defendant for discovery purposes only. There was a decree for the complainant, and Mrs. Dyess appealed.

The bill charged that on March 3, 1950, W. S. Dyess was indebted to A. J. Hill in the sum of $3,000, evidenced *683by three promissory notes of $1,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. McShaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Odom v. LeuhrMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Richards v. VaccaroMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API