Peoples National Bank v. Schepflin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show' cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of tire court was delivered by
Pitney, J.
This action was brought to recover the amount due upon a promissory note dated June 11th, 1903, payable to the order of the plaintiff, for $3,866.57, signed by the defendant and her husband, Christian Schepflin, who -died before the commencement of suit. The malting and delivery of the note were not disputed. The defence was that it was made without consideration moving to the defendant; that at the time of the malting thereof she was a married woman, and gave the note as surety for her husband, and that she neither directly nor indirectly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Messmore v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Todd v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Dawson v. Maryland Electric RailwayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Hillsdale Nat. Bank v. SansoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Anamoose National Bank v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.