Legal Opinion

Peoples National Bank v. Schepflin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On rule to show' cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of tire court was delivered by

Pitney, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount due upon a promissory note dated June 11th, 1903, payable to the order of the plaintiff, for $3,866.57, signed by the defendant and her husband, Christian Schepflin, who -died before the commencement of suit. The malting and delivery of the note were not disputed. The defence was that it was made without consideration moving to the defendant; that at the time of the malting thereof she was a married woman, and gave the note as surety for her husband, and that she neither directly nor indirectly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Messmore v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Todd v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Dawson v. Maryland Electric RailwayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. Hillsdale Nat. Bank v. SansoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Anamoose National Bank v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API