In re the Marriage of Lenhart
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Husband appeals from the trial court’s supplemental judgment denying his motion to modify a dissolution judgment. Husband moved to terminate or substantially decrease his obligation to pay spousal maintenance support and his obligation to maintain a life insurance policy for wife’s benefit. The trial court found that there was no substantial change of circumstances warranting modification. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.
The relevant facts regarding the dissolution are largely undisputed. During their 30-year marriage, husband earned the family’s income while wife primarily…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Marriage of HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- In re the Marriage of RubeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of Ganger & LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of NewtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Marriage of FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011