Legal Opinion

Popkin Bros. v. Dunlap

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1937No. Appeal, 170PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This case began as an action upon a book account by Popkin Brothers, the plaintiff corporation, against E. Tilton Dunlap to recover $137 for potatoes sold and delivered to him; it was tried before a judge sitting without a jury and ended in a finding, and judgment thereon, in the sum of $163, with interest, in favor of the defendant upon his counter-claim; hence this appeal by the plaintiff.

Both parties were engaged in the business of buying and selling potatoes in wholesale quantities and defendant’s specialty was supplying ship chandlers. The respective contentions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seward v. Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Raby, Inc. v. Ward-Meehan Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Mindlin v. O'BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Pittsburg Sheet Manufacturing Co. v. West Penn Sheet Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Delmont Gas Coal Co. v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. MacChia v. MegowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Werfel v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Schnabel Associates, Inc. v. T & M Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. American Paper & Pulp Co. v. DenenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API