Legal Opinion
State v. Hames
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 12, 2008No. 06C47677, A133950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
In this prosecution for various drug offenses, the state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence obtained as the result of a motor vehicle stop. ORS 138.060(l)(c). The state asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that the officer who performed the stop lacked reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had committed a crime. ORS 131.615(1). We review for errors of law, ORS 138.220, and affirm.
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. At 10:30 p.m. on October 22, 2005, Officer Johnston was dispatched to respond to a report of suspicious activity in a park. The report came…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Villegas-VarelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MitcheleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. De La RosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. KillionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.