Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2008No. Nos. 2007-0549 and 2007-0684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} This is a dispute between the city of Dayton, appellee, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), appellant. We must decide which party is primarily liable for the alleged negligence of a city of Dayton employee who, while driving a city vehicle, apparently caused an accident that injured the plaintiff. To answer this question, we must interpret former R.C. 3937.18(E)(3), 148 Ohio Laws, Part V, 11380, 11383-11384, which excluded a motor vehicle “self-insured within the meaning of the financial responsibility law of the state” from being “uninsured” or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kurent v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Galanos v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hunter v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rogers v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API