Legal Opinion

Turpin v. Smedinghoff

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1994No. 21417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

James E. Turpin obtained a dissolution of his partnership with Patrice Smedinghoff. He appeals from the part of the judgment that distributed the partnership assets equally between the two partners, awarded Turpin the sum of $1000, and awarded Smedinghoff $9,840.90 in attorney’s fees and costs. Because we find that substantial evidence supports the court’s conclusion that the partnership assets should be divided equally between the partners and the conclusion that Turpin should recover $1000 in expenses, we affirm the judgment in part. Smedinghoff, however, failed to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hsu Ying Li v. TangWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Perez v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Asarco Inc. v. Air Quality CoalitionWashington Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. New Mexico State Highway & Transportation Department v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. GCM, Inc. v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Moody v. StriblingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp. v. Peters Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API