Legal Opinion
Echo MAV, LLC v. Horizon31, LLC and Brad Stinson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 6, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00401Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ECHO MAV, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:25-CV-401-TAV-JEM ) HORIZON31, LLC, and ) BRAD STINSON, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This civil matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. 13]. Plaintiff has responded in opposition [Doc. 16], and this matter is now ripe for the Court’s review. E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1(a). For the reasons explained below, the Court will GRANT in part and DENY in part the motion to dismiss [Doc. 13]. I. Background The complaint alleges that plaintiff Echo MAV, LLC (“Echo…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.