Legal Opinion

Christine Scrivner v. Walmart Inc., et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2026No. 2:25-cv-03103Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTINE SCRIVNER, No. 2:25-cv-03103-DAD-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 14 WALMART INC., et al., (Doc. No. 19) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to stay this action pursuant to the 18 first-to-file rule. (Doc. No. 19.) On July 21, 2026, the motion was taken under submission 19 pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 20.) For the reasons explained below, defendants’ 20 motion will be denied. 21 BACKGROUND 22 A. The Thomas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API