Legal Opinion

Harman v. Barhydt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Hayward, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

In June, 1885, the defendant Coverdale executed and delivered to Barhydt a chattel mortgage upon certain household furniture, to secure the payment of nine promissory notes, which will be referred tó hereafter. The mortgage contained the following provision: “And I, the said Thomas Coverdale, do hereby covenant and agree to and with the said A. G. Barhydt, that in case of default made in the payment of the above mentioned promissory notes or any of them, or in case of my attempting to dispose of or remove from said county of Cass and city of Plattsmouth the aforesaid goods and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turpin v. CoatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stich v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Taylor v. AdairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Summers v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Carter v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whipple v. FowlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. . American Loan Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Waddle v. OwenNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State Bank v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API