Legal Opinion

Haendel v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1996No. 90-CC-0234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Epstein, J.

Claimant, a professor of sculpture at Northern Illinois University (the “University”), now retired, brought this two-count claim against the University seeking recovery for flood damage to his artwork which had been kept on University-leased premises. These claims, as alleged in Claimants amended complaint, are before the Court on the Respondent University’s motion to dismiss which, though undesignated, is a section 2 — 619 motion that asserts four affirmative bars to Claimant’s tort (count I) and contract (count II) claims.

1. The Amended Complaint

Claiman…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thompson v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Barrett v. FritzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Wright v. Mr. Quick, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Jackson v. Shell Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubidoux v. Northeastern Illinois UniversitiesCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1998
  2. Garimella v. Board of Trustees of the University of IllinoisCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API